11 posts tagged “iphone”
I returned my Blackberry Curve
... It is a great phone except for the annoying camera shutter sound that you can't shut off. For those of you that have my number, as soon as I find my old LG phone then my old 3997 number will reach me again I'll have to give you another new number since the Verizon guys had to get creative to give me a new phone - since I lost my LG somehow. Long story short, I had to get a new number in order for their accounting to work out.
A note to those that use
Verizon Wireless ... do not consider switching to ATT/Cingular if you like the speed of your data plan. ATT/Cingular's EDGE network sucks big time. I mean it really sucks compared to VZW's EV-DO network.
To sum it up
... the Blackberry Curve is an excellent phone. The ATT EDGE network is very very very very bad. Think like going back to dial up. All those poor iPhone users are on the same EDGE system as well.
I wouldn't be surprised
if ATT is using some sort of 'class of service' scheme to make allow the iPhone EDGE users to move data a higher priority than the non-iphone EDGE users.
At least one person with ties to Apple has read my iPhone Sucks post. I was bitch slapped by PM for 'Apple' trashing. What? I'm not Apple trashing - far from it.
With regard to the Applegasms that alot of us had on Tuesday... Was it good for you?
Why does the iPhone suck?
While the device currently known as iPhone is a game changing device, the branding sucks. Please allow me to explain.
Think about it.
Isn't the name iPhone a rather bland, uninspiring
name for such a effing sexy, technology forward device? This device deserves a 'historic'
name, not a borrowed generic name. How boring is iPhone as a name?
So, I am to believe that a device that makes calls, IMs, browses the web, delivers the news, licks your toes, plays music, stores pictures of last Saturday night's debauchery, and gives directions is going to be called an 'iPhone' ... ? I just don't think so man, I just don't think so.
Apple apparently does not
have the right to the trade name 'iPhone', rather Cisco owns that name. It appears that both companies had an agreement but something fell through and it was never a closed deal.
Since you asked,
here's my take on how the next 6 months might play out. You know how I love to fan the flames with baseless (breathless?) speculation so here goes:
- Apple does not intend to use the name 'iPhone' when the product actually goes to market
- A good amount of media coverage will ensue as these two classic Silicon Valley companies slug it out
- Apple sends Cisco a nice check for using the name during MacWorld and in promotions that may or may not run
- Apple decides to brand their device as a more progressive, technology forward consumer device
I don't know what
will happen, but the device currently known as the Apple iPhone deserves a unique brand name. Mac and iPod are unique names - don't borrow from them.
Christmas MacWorld keynote is today... 12 EST.